As Anthony Weston points out in Back To Earth, society has become
obsessed with, “the closed circle of human life alone.” (Weston 85) He calls
this loss of interest in the more than human world “desolation”. (Weston 85) We
have changed the landscape of our country to work to our advantage, and in the
process ruined vast swaths of wildlife habitat and driven many species extinct.
How can we continue to inhabit this world while turning a blind eye to its
well-being? Without appreciation and respect for our environment, it is easy to
push its importance to the backburner. This lack of appreciation may be the
beginning of the “free rider” complex. With so many people inhabiting the
Earth, it is easy for some to benefit from others hard work. For example, if
everyone littered the world would be covered in trash. But if most people are
responsible with their waste, a few free riders would be able to get away with
littering. This example is something I encounter a lot at Tony Tank. Along the
path there is always an abundance of trash nestled in the leaves and briars.
Coffee cups, soda bottles, cigarette packs, candy wrappers, articles of
clothing and old tires. Anything you could imagine tossed carelessly aside, to
eventually be washed into the Wicomico River. This could have greater impacts
than we originally could have imagined. Currently the world’s largest landfill
is located in the Pacific Ocean. This clockwise, slow moving pile of trash
known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is twice the size of Texas. Ninety
percent of trash in our oceans is plastic, which is unable to biodegrade. This is incredibly destructive for marine
life that mistakes this material for food. Additionally these small pieces of
plastic have the ability to soak up toxic chemicals, which is ingested by
filter feeders and subsequently makes its way up the food chain (Silverman).
Unfortunately the trash we see on the surface, like I encounter along the
shores of Tony Tank, may not be the end of our problem. Trash that washes into
the water and sinks to the bottom goes unnoticed by humans, but poses the
biggest threat to wildlife. An area that may look relatively well kept could have
even more problems beneath its waters. In addition to ingesting these items,
animals may also become trapped or entangled in them as well.
This carelessness is not sustainable
for the animals and plant life here. The Wicomico River, into which Tony Tank
feeds, is already contaminated with excess nutrients, sediments, and toxic
contaminates. A toxicity study on the river shows that sediment-poor water from
the sewage treatment plant upstream was “very toxic”, which contributed to
“slightly toxic” waters downstream, where it crosses with Tony Tank pond
(“Toxicity Study”). Additionally, an
article in the Journal of Hazardous Materials from 2005 found that the Wicomico
River is considered one of the most polluted rivers in Maryland (“Endocrine
Disruptor”). This is based on levels of nutrients, metals, and micro-organisms.
Even normal day to day activities can grow to have an impact as big as a sewage
treatment plant. The perfect green lawns that surround Tony Tank can leak
fertilizer runoff into the waters, as well as fuel from boats. I have
consistently noticed a shiny patch of oil runoff during my weekly visits to the
pond, right under the bridge. Something as common as driving our cars everyday
can even contribute to this habitat destruction. Two of the main toxicants in
Wicomico River sediment-poor water were ammonia and heavy metals. One negative
side effect from ammonia is soil acidification. When ammonia reaches the
surface of the soil it can react with water to create ammonium. It is also able
to react with other particulates causing smog, eutrophication, and creates
changes in the ecosystem that disrupt the delicate balance of an area (Impacts
of Ammonia). Heavy metals on the other hand are known carcinogens and can cause
multiple organ damage in humans (Tchounwou, Yedjou, Patlolla, and
Sutton).
I have spent the last two months
growing incredibly attached to this body of water. I love the way the tide
sneaks in to hide the lily pads from view, and the way the turtles sunbathe
near the bridge on bright sunny days. When I drive by and see another person
fishing or admiring the view, although it is rare, it always brings a smile to
my face to know that we share the same appreciation and respect for this land.
It is almost as if we are sharing a secret that others have not yet discovered.
I have begun to treat it differently as well. I could no longer walk by and
ignore the litter strewn around. It became my responsibility to pick up the
trash along the road, in the forest, and along the bank. As I drove by one day
on my way to school, I noticed one of the turtles I had spent hours observing
crossing the road. A huge ford truck passed me going in the other direction,
and I immediately knew I had to pull over to assist this turtle in its
crossing. This land had become a part of me, and I couldn’t bear to see it
trashed, abused, or its inhabaitants crushed. The more time I spent at Tony
Tank Pond, the more my biophobia transformed into a deep respect of the natural
world.
In today’s society, how can we
promote biophilia? Biophilia is a term created by Edward O. Wilson in 1984.
Wilson defines it as, “the innate tendency to focus on life and lifelike
processes.” (Wilson 1) He believes that we are born with an inner desire to
associate with nature, and that this affiliation is crucial to mental
development. In today’s world of abundant social media, computers, and TV, how
can we encourage others to embrace biophilia? It is clear that biophobia can
only lead to destruction in the long run. If the free rider manner of living
became the norm, who would be there to uphold our values? Who would lead by
example, and teach others respect, appreciation, and wonder for the world
around us? Fortunately, there seems to be a solution to this complicated
concept. As David Orr writes in Earth in
Mind, our society is focused on educating the younger generation to become
competitive in the global economy. However this will only lead to the
destruction of a habitable planet. We must instead strive to educate future
generations with a well-rounded and ecologically centered education that will
allow them to become educated on, and thus earn appreciation and respect for,
the planet. Orr writes, “Biophobia is not ok because it is the foundation for a
politics of domination and exploitation.” (Orr 136) We must strive to end this
exploitation, beginning with the younger generations.
Natalie Cieri
Works Cited
Gupta, Gian, and Nelum
Dorabawila. "Endocrine Disrupter—estradiol—in Chesapeake Bay Tributaries." Journal of Hazardous
Waste, Feb. 2005. Web. 7 Nov. 2015.
Gupta, Gian, and Makesh
Karuppiah. "Toxicity Study of a Chesapeake Bay Tributary - Wicomico River." Chemosphere, Mar. 1996.
Web. 07 Nov. 2015
"Impacts of Ammonia."
Impacts of Ammonia. Colorado State University, 20 June 2008. Web. 25 Nov. 2015.
Orr, David W. Earth in Mind:
On Education, Environment, and the Human Prospect. Washington, DC: Island, 1994. Print.
Silverman, Jacob. "Why Is
the World's Biggest Landfill in the Pacific Ocean?" AccessScience (n.d.): n. pag. 12 Dec. 2013. Web.
Tchounwou, Paul B., Clement G.
Yedjou, Anita K. Patlolla, and Dwayne J. Sutton. "Heavy Metals Toxicity and the
Environment." EXS. U.S. National Library of Medicine, n.d. Web. 25 Nov. 2015.
Weston,
Anthony. Back to Earth: Tomorrow's Environmentalism. Philadelphia:
Temple UP, 1994. Print.
Wilson, Edward O. Biophilia. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard UP, 1984. Print.
I like very much how you bring your detailed observations of Tony Tank Pond into connection with the Pacific Gyre. Developing a feeling for how the local and the global are interwoven with one another is an important part of becoming a responsible biotic citizen. I also applaud how you tie the practice of natural history to the phenomena of biophilia and biophobia.
ReplyDeleteIt is true that human specie has greater appreciation of what we are near losing/ or have already lost.
ReplyDeleteWhy exactly? is an answer i am uncertain off myself also.
Great you found natural details of the area you visited at Tony Tank Pond to love, amidst the irritable pollution of man.
Being removed from nature while living in New York City makes perfect sense that you began to appreciate the natural world then because we often do not miss things until they are gone. I see a nice connection with you spending time in the city and then reflecting upon toxicity in your natural history. This seems like a topic that you are very passionate about. Also, the focus of biophopia vs. biophilia was such a great focus because if people around the Tony Tank presumably love nature, then how can more people not be taking a stand to protect this body of water and its tributaries. I really enjoyed your writing style and the imagery you used was so vivid and pure.
ReplyDeleteNatalie, your writing is a pleasure to read. I have never been to Tony Tank, but through your description I was able to visualize the pond. Like Dr. Hatley stated I was really impressed by your connections between local and global problems. I think when it comes to the education of the public being able to put global problems into perspective with local examples is a great way to encourage passion about solving these problems. Also, you made a great point that honestly I had not put much thought into. The dangers of the trash beneath the waters, not just that which floats on top or litters the shores. Great job!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading about how your love for the Tony Tank Pond influenced your perception of the pollution around you. Trash is an interesting concept in nature because to the person that left it there they intrinsically separating themselves from the natural world by using it as their garbage can while people like you who see this issue are called to clean it up because you have a deeper connection and appreciation for the land. Another thing I found interesting about your paper was your use of the word "Biosphobia" to describe your time separated by nature in New York. I often believe that this word applies best to people that have grown up in areas separated by nature with no real appreciation for it and fear it for its difference but you on the other hand were raised to love nature and so your interaction with the natural world reflects a period where it was like a mild "wilderness amnesia" where you forgot just how wonderful the outdoors could be until you were introduced to it again. Overall this was a very incite and wonderful piece.
ReplyDeleteThis was a great read, the issue you raise about Biophobia is a very important one that can not be kept unacknowledged. It is practically imperative that we utilize our educational system to change our norms and values, as you point out, or we may face many unforeseen environmental impacts in the future. I was especially intrigued when you talked about the food chain and the flow of toxins and heavy metals, which are the primary pollutants of the Wicomico river. This immediately reminded me of bioaccumulation and the DDT pesticide that Rachel Carson mentions in her book "Silent Springs," let's hope we can prevent the publication of "Silent Salisbury."
ReplyDelete